Amy Chua’s recent (2010) book,
Battle Hymn of the Tiger Mother, set off a fervent discussion of the
degree to which Asian American parenting styles, especially their investment in
their children’s education, was important in producing the observed
above-average performance of these children subsequent to their schooling.
In March 2014, the United
States Bureau of Labor Statistics produced an analytical report related to this
issue, “Investment in Higher Education by Race and Ethnicity,” written by Tian
Luo and Richard J Holden. They showed that, compared to white parents,
African-American parents invested less and Asian-American parents invested more
in their children’s education, with Hispanics not being statistically
significantly different from other whites in this regard. [The authors
controlled for several of the most likely confounding variables in their
analysis.]
Different degrees of
investment in their offspring are found throughout the entire range of the
animal kingdom. In fact, those who study such things have a term for the two
extreme cases of parental in fact inspect investment, “R and K strategies,” the
terms derived from the equations generally used in the field to model the
outcomes of the two strategies:
A short article (by Jared
Reser) posted on the Internet by the Organization for the Advancement of
Interdisciplinary Learning
[http://jaredreser.com/Background/Biology/randkstrategies.html] described the
two extremes:
· “R-strategists
usually create an abundance of offspring in the hopes that a few will make it.
The species usually have a very short maturation time, often breed at a very
young age, have a short lifespan, produce many offspring very quickly, have
young with high mortality rates, and invest relatively little in parental care.
The parents do not focus on passing down memes, units of cultural information,
to their young. Instead the behavior of the young is determined by their genes.
The young are precocial, meaning that they often can make it on their own
without any instruction from their parents. Examples of r-selected species
include bacteria, insects, and fish.”
· “K-strategists
are very different in that they attempt to ensure the survival of their
offspring by investing time in them, instead of investing in lots of them. It
is a reproductive strategy that focuses on quality over quantity. K-strategists
have relatively few offspring and make an effort at being good parents. Their
young are altricial meaning that they cannot survive on their own until they
reach adulthood. This extended period of maturation is used for mimetic
transference – the parents teach the young so that they can go on to reproduce
themselves. K strategists are known to have a relatively long life span,
produce relatively few offspring; the offspring have lower mortality rates and
parents provide extensive parental care. The offspring are also relatively
intelligent so that they can internalize the lessons from their parents.
K-selected species include elephants, apes and whales. Humans are perhaps the
most K selected….”
The same source produced the following ordering of organism
types, from the R-strategists to the K-strategists, or quantity versus quality
strategy: bacteria, mollusks, insects, fish, amphibians, reptiles, mammals, apes,
humans…an ordering that resembles that of evolution, from the least to the most
advanced species.
An article posed by the University of Miami
[http://www.bio.miami.edu/tom/courses/bil160/bil160goods/16_rKselection.html]
entitled “r and K selection,” based on evolutionary considerations, notes
· “Organisms that
live in stable environments tend to make few, ‘expensive’ offspring. Organisms
that live in unstable environments tend to make many, ‘cheap’ offspring.” When
investment is risky, it is wise to invest little.
· It makes more
sense to invest when the life spans are longer, to give time for the investment
to pay off.
· If you plot the
fraction who survive versus the age of the organism, the r (quantity) species
(bacteria, oysters) tend to lose a far larger fraction at young ages compared
to their maximum life spans than do the K (quality) species (whales, humans)
compared to their maximum lifespans. Which is cause and which is effect? Do
they die young because of a lack of investment? Do they live longer because of
the investment? Ecologists study this kind of issue, often related to the
“carrying capacity” of the environment, related to the number the environment
could handle if they lived to the maximum lifetime.
When
applied to the global situation for humans, this theory indicates that in
dangerous parts of the world and in dangerous times, having many children is a
strategy that may maximize the chance that some survive. In the less hazardous,
developed part of the world during peaceful times, having fewer children and
giving them more input is advantageous for those who seek to pass on their
genes and ideas. Thus, ethnic groups and races that traditionally have had
large families are generally expected to have fewer children as their safety improves.
Of course, culture and religion can work to over-ride this tendency.
Anecdotally,
I have seen this investment in education by my Chinese American in-laws: eldest
child, daughter Irene, went to Cornell on a scholarship and eventually became
an orthodontist; middle daughter, Tina, went to Cornell on a scholarship and
eventually became an Asian Studies scholar who worked for the Encyclopedia
Britannica; youngest child, son Eugene, went to a private high school and
then on to Brown and became a rheumatologist. The girls would have preferred
other schools but family resources were saved to facilitate Eugene’s becoming
an M.D. Furthermore, these parents themselves were the products of intensive
educational investment, the mother having gotten her degree with a major in
chemistry at China’s pre-eminent Tsinghua University, where she met their
father, who went on to get his Sc.D. degree at America’s Massachusetts
Institute of Technology on a scholarship he won in a nation-wide competition in
China back in the 1930s.
According
to a research paper entitled “The Rise of Asian Americans,” published in June
2012 and updated in April of 2013 by the Pew Research Center
[http://www.pewsocialtrends.org/2012/06/19/the-rise-of-asian-americans/], the
median family incomes---which might be taken as a measure of success---of
groups in America are in almost the same order as the percentages holding bachelor’s
degrees or more among those who are 25 and older and in those groups.
Specifically, 49% of Asians, 31% of whites, 18% of blacks, and 13% of Hispanics
hold a bachelor’s degree or more among the population 25 and older in 2010.
Similarly, the median household incomes in 2010 were: for Asians $66,000; for
whites $54,000; for Hispanics $40,000; and for blacks $33,300. Some Asian
subgroups have higher poverty levels than the U.S. average, some lower,
however.
Granted,
there is always some question about which is the cause and which is the effect
when looking at correlations. Conceivably, this order might due to the greater
availability of college to groups that have greater incomes, but it seems more
likely that it reflects the greater probability for financial success of groups
that have a higher percentage of their population with college degrees. In
other words, investment in advanced education has paid off in terms of relative
incomes, whether or not it was financially sound.
The
same Pew report noted that 2/3 of Asians believed having a successful marriage
is one of the most important things in life, whereas only 50% of other
Americans agreed with this. Their newborns are less likely than those of other
Americans to have an unmarried mother (16% vs. 41%), although that figure is
higher (31%) for women of Asian ancestry born in the U.S.
The Pew
report describes the arc of Asian ascension the U.S.: “A century ago, most
Asian Americans were low-skilled., low-wage laborers crowded into ethnic
enclaves and targets of official discrimination. Today they are the most likely
of any major racial or ethnic group in America to live in mixed neighborhoods
and to marry across racial lines. When newly minted medical school graduate
Priscilla Chan married Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg last month, she joined
the 37% of all recent Asian American brides who wed a non-Asian groom.”
###
Dr. Cooper (douglas@tingandi.com), a retired scientist, is
now an author, editor, and writing coach. His first book, Ting and I: A
Memoir of Love, Courage and Devotion, was published by Outskirts Press in
2011. Also available from online booksellers are two memoirs he co-authored, The
Shield of Gold and Kidnapped Twice, and three memoirs he edited: High
Shoes and Bloomers and But…at What Cost and Home is Where the
Story Begins. With Adria Goldman Gross, he recently co-authored Solved!
Curing Your Medical Insurance Problems. His latest book is Write Your
Book with Me. On Twitter, he is @douglaswcooper. His writing, editing,
coaching site is http://WriteYourBookWithMe.com/blog.